Tim, That looks like a good set of enhancements. Just one comment and one question:
* I suspect that the "DISK 15.1" anomaly is caused by an extra space between "DISK" and "15.1", which gets it an extra pile of zeroes. * Do you plan to leave the existing sort label infrastructure there, and use that as a secondary ORDER BY clause (assuming one can assign NULL or duplicate order values), or will the user be forced to set the ordering by hand? That is implied by, but not explicit in, your description. Thanks! --miker On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Tim Spindler <tjspind...@gmail.com> wrote: > We are looking for comment on the proposed development. Attached is the > specification. > > -- > > ____________________________ > > Tim Spindler > > Manager of Library Applications > > tspind...@cwmars.org > > 508-755-3323 x20 > IM: tjspindler (AOL, meebo, google wave) > > > > C/W MARS, Inc. > > 67 Millbrook St, Suite 201 > > Worcester, MA 01606 > http://www.cwmars.org > > *P** Go Green - **Save a tree! Please don't print this e-mail unless > it's really necessary.* > > > -- Mike Rylander | Director of Research and Development | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source | phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: mi...@esilibrary.com | web: http://www.esilibrary.com