Hi, On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Rogan Hamby <rogan.ha...@yclibrary.net> wrote: > I hadn't considered special libraries, I was thinking of academic and > public. Still, I would want some pretty tight safeguards. Some consortiums > allow some local admins to have access to org unit settings to customize > behavior for their systems (in our case county). The training and > preparation of those local admin often varies with the county's resources. > Most mistakes can be recovered from without too much fuss but the bad > impression this would leave ... well, it could be downright toxic. I admit, > we in SC may be overly sensitive to privacy in some ways since our Dept of > Revenue got hacked and folks in Eastern Europe got so much of our > information but yeah, if this went into Evergreen as a patron viewable > option it would have to be very controllable on a server level in a top down > way or we would have to seriously re-evaluate a lot and it could end up with > removing a lot of options from local systems.
Agreed. This sort of thing may be better done either as a contrib or as something that requires editing opensrf.xml to enable. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Manager of Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: g...@esilibrary.com direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web: http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & http://evergreen-ils.org