On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 01:29:43PM +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote: > > What was the reason for adding the block device name to the block symlink > if this symlink already provides this name?
I find it useful when doing this: find /sys/class/iscsi_session/session*/device/ -name block:* | sed 's/.*:/' And I can get all of the block disks names without have to read the link(s). > > It probably breaks everything that uses this block path directly to find > out the device it is pointing to. Not sure what you mean. This sysfs structure has been in existence for some time (since 2.0-754) so code written to use this format is not broken. I would think that code that uses the block device would be using the /sys/block/sdX interface instead? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
