On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Boaz Harrosh<bharr...@panasas.com> wrote: > On 06/11/2009 08:41 PM, Mike Christie wrote: >> It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel >> developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i, >> iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being written. So it seems like we >> are going to have lots of patches. I would also like to start sending my >> kernel patches out in a way that everyone can see them. Previously to >> avoid noise on this list, I have been pinging you guys privately which >> just does not work so well now when we have so many people. >> >> What do you people think? >> >> Do other people on the list prefer to see everything here, so you can >> see what features are making progress? > > I vote: One list, All patches posted
I agree that having just one mailing list is the most convenient for kernel developers. But not everyone who is subscribed to open-iscsi is a kernel developer. Wouldn't it be more convenient for iSCSI users to have two lists -- one intended for iSCSI users, and one for iSCSI developers, such that the users can subscribe to the former only ? Just my two cents. Bart. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
