Rakesh Ranjan wrote: > Mike Christie wrote: >> On 09/04/2009 07:44 AM, Rakesh Ranjan wrote: >>> Rakesh Ranjan wrote: >>>> Mike Christie wrote: >>>>> On 09/01/2009 09:53 AM, Mike Christie wrote: >>>>>> On 09/01/2009 03:58 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: >>>>>>> Mike Christie wrote: >>>>>>>> Or, I am ccing you because some time ago Erez was working on >>>>>>>> support >>>>>>>> for older RHEL and SLES kernels for OFED. It looks like the patch >>>>>>>> below would not be useful to you because iser is supported in those >>>>>>>> kernels, but did you guys all need RHEL 4 and maybe SLES 9 support >>>>>>>> too? >>>>>>> Hi Mike, I'm used to work with patches which have a change log >>>>>>> and are >>>>>>> signed, where this patch lacks both, so I can't really understand >>>>>>> what >>>>>>> it is about, sorry. >>>>>>> >>>>>> A signature is not going to help you understand that patch will >>>>>> it? :) >>>>>> >>>>>> I do not think a changelog will help either since it is the first >>>>>> version of a RFC patch. >>>>>> >>>>>> From the subject of the mail and the body it looks like Rakesh is >>>>>> trying to port libiscsi to older distro kernels (RHEL 5 and SLES 10 >>>>>> based) so he can support cxgb3i on them. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am just asking you guys if you also need RHEL 4 and SLES 9 support. >>>>>> >>>>> You guys meaning, do you need iser and does Rakesh need cxgb3i? >>>> Hi Mike, >>>> >>>> Yes we do want to support cxgb3i on RHEL4/SLES9. I am sending the >>>> modified patch against current james tree's libiscsi part. This patch >>>> can replace existing 2.6.14-23_compat.patch. >>> >>> Hi Mike, >>> >>> Here is updated patch that fixes some MACROS to fix compilation issue on >>> RHEL5.0 and SLES10.2 >>> >> >> The idea is that I can just drop in your patch over the existing >> 2.6.14-23_compat.patch compat patch right? >> >> cd open-iscsi/kernel >> mv your_patch 2.6.14-23_compat.patch >> make >> >> (the build system's patching code assumes we are in the kernel dir so >> I just have to remove the /kernel/ strings from the diff). >> > > Hi Mike, > > Yep that would work, BTW this patch applies against libiscsi of james > tree (after copying related part, I fixed those files inclusion > directive as to be part of open-iscsi tree).
Hi Mike, What happened to this patch. We need this patch upstream. If you want me to send it again just ping me. Regards Rakesh Ranjan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
