> -----Original Message----- > From: devel-boun...@open-fcoe.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-fcoe.org] > On Behalf Of Mike Christie > Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:05 AM > To: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com > Cc: eric.w.multa...@intel.com; de...@open-fcoe.org > Subject: Re: [Open-FCoE] [fcoemon PATCH v2 00/11] rfcoemon > restructuring > > shyam_i...@dell.com wrote: > > Shouldn't the requirement to administer DCB be FCoE independent ? > After > > all DCB is required for other protocols like iscsi as well. > > > > It is not required for iscsi. I think people are thinking it is going > to > be useful for iscsi though.
Uh Ok.. I meant DCB would be useful for both FCoE and iSCSI. On the other hand it is a requirement for FCoE. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "open-iscsi" group. To post to this group, send email to open-is...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en.
