On Monday 12 April 2010 22:32:33 Mike Christie wrote:
> On 04/12/2010 09:21 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> + * Helper routiners to check to determine if the entry is valid
> >> + * in the proper iBFT structure.
> >> + */
> >> +static mode_t ibft_check_nic_for(void *data, int type)
> >> +{
> >> + struct ibft_kobject *entry = data;
> >> + struct ibft_nic *nic = entry->nic;
> >> + mode_t rc = 0;
> >> +
> >> + switch (type) {
> >> + case ISCSI_BOOT_ETH_INDEX:
> >> + case ISCSI_BOOT_ETH_FLAGS:
> >> + rc = 1;
> >
> > Did you mean for that value?
> >
> >> + break;
> >> + case ISCSI_BOOT_ETH_IP_ADDR:
> >> + if (memcmp(nic->ip_addr, nulls, sizeof(nic->ip_addr)))
> >> + rc = S_IRUGO;
> >> + break;
> >> + case ISCSI_BOOT_ETH_SUBNET_MASK:
> >> + if (nic->subnet_mask_prefix)
> >> + rc = S_IRUGO;
> >> + break;
> >> + case ISCSI_BOOT_ETH_ORIGIN:
> >> + rc = 1;
> >
> > and this one as well?
>
> I did not. They should be S_IRUGO. Do you want me to resubmit the
> patches or are you just going to edit those two lines if you merge them?
No need to resend them (unless Peter eyes found something I missed).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this group, send email to open-is...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi?hl=en.
