On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:11:19PM +0200, Benjamin Block wrote:
> Since struct bsg_command is now used in every calling case, we don't
> need separation of arguments anymore that are contained in the same
> bsg_command.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Block <bbl...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  block/bsg.c | 13 ++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
> index 8517361a9b3f..6ee2ffca808a 100644
> --- a/block/bsg.c
> +++ b/block/bsg.c
> @@ -212,11 +212,12 @@ bsg_validate_sgv4_hdr(struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, int *op)
>   * map sg_io_v4 to a request.
>   */
>  static struct request *
> -bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t 
> has_write_perm,
> -         u8 *reply_buffer)
> +bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct bsg_command *bc,
> +         fmode_t has_write_perm)

I wish we could just rename the argument to mode and pass on the
whole file->f_mode while you are cleaning up this code.  That should
be a separate patch, though.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to open-iscsi@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/open-iscsi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to