I agree that sharing the initiator name and the other config files
would not be recommended. 

The initiator name is often used as an access controll method on the
target.   Which could lead to double mounting volumes. 

Also one benefit would be better isolating an iSCSI SAN with multiple
customers accessing the SAN via unique containers.    

It should be possible to specify those files and directories as part of
the container config.  

Don

On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 11:17 -0800, The Lee-Man wrote:
> I wanted to mention some issues I've discovered as part of testing
> this:
> 
> * Currently, only some sysfs entries are going to be different per
> namespace
> * This means that the Configuration and Initiator Name are going to
> be
> common to all running daemons (this is /etc/iscsi)
> * This also means that the Node database (and discovery DB, and
> interface DB) are common to all running daemons
> I'm really not sure all running daemons should have the same
> initiator name. If we think of them as separate initiators, then this
> seems wrong.
> 
> Sharing the Node database may not be a good idea, either. This
> assumes that nodes discovered (and saved) from one namespace can
> actually be reached from other namespaces, but this may not be true.
> Having the Node DB and initiatorname shared means the different
> iscsid instances must cooperate with each other, else their requests
> can collide. Also, I can imagine situations where different daemons
> may want to set different configuration values. Currently they
> cannot.
> 
> On Wednesday, February 8, 2023 at 9:41:02 AM UTC-8 The Lee-Man wrote:
> > From: Lee Duncan <ldu...@suse.com>
> > 
> > This is a request for comment on a set of patches that
> > modify the kernel iSCSI initiator communications so that
> > they are namespace-aware. The goal is to allow multiple
> > iSCSI daemon (iscsid) to run at once as long as they
> > are in separate namespaces, and so that iscsid can
> > run in containers.
> > 
> > Comments and suggestions are more than welcome. I do not
> > expect that this code is production-ready yet, and
> > networking isn't my strongest suit (yet).
> > 
> > These patches were originally posted in 2015 by Chris
> > Leech. There were some issues at the time about how
> > to handle namespaces going away. I hope to address
> > any issues raised with this patchset and then
> > to merge these changes upstream to address working
> > in working in containers.
> > 
> > My contribution thus far has been to update these patches
> > to work with the current upstream kernel.
> > 
> > Chris Leech/Lee Duncan (9):
> > iscsi: create per-net iscsi netlink kernel sockets
> > iscsi: associate endpoints with a host
> > iscsi: sysfs filtering by network namespace
> > iscsi: make all iSCSI netlink multicast namespace aware
> > iscsi: set netns for iscsi_tcp hosts
> > iscsi: check net namespace for all iscsi lookup
> > iscsi: convert flashnode devices from bus to class
> > iscsi: rename iscsi_bus_flash_* to iscsi_flash_*
> > iscsi: filter flashnode sysfs by net namespace
> > 
> > drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.c | 7 +-
> > drivers/scsi/be2iscsi/be_iscsi.c | 6 +-
> > drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_iscsi.c | 6 +-
> > drivers/scsi/cxgbi/libcxgbi.c | 6 +-
> > drivers/scsi/iscsi_tcp.c | 7 +
> > drivers/scsi/qedi/qedi_iscsi.c | 6 +-
> > drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_os.c | 64 +--
> > drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c | 625 ++++++++++++++++-------
> > include/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.h | 63 ++-
> > 9 files changed, 537 insertions(+), 253 deletions(-)
> > 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"open-iscsi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to open-iscsi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/open-iscsi/ff5f785cc888a72737f5f4bc7cfc55cb41a15a5e.camel%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to