Understood, Abe. I just wanted to get some agreement with you and/or Patrick before pursuing this type of change. Thanks!
Kevin On 1/31/07, Abe White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, if we have dirtied the Persistence Context, then do a > flush() > followed by the detachAllInternal(). I don't think the clear() > should be > doing this flush() operation. Any disagreement? I agree. But note that just removing the flush call won't work for a couple of reasons: it's needed by JDO, and we'll just flush later in the DetachManager when we detect a dirty instance. So just a warning that it isn't quite as trivial a fix as it might appear to be. _______________________________________________________________________ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.