Fair enough. Cutting a candidate release would be a good way to provide the "deadline". This would allow any in-flight Issues to be resolved before we make this 0.9.7 final.
Kevin On 3/27/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hate to bring this up, but it takes more than a day or two to cut a release and have it approved. Take a look at the 0.9.6 release. Granted, we're smarter than that now, but it still takes some time. Let's say we built a candidate release right now. You want to give the community a chance to find issues with it or to complain that bug xyz hasn't been fixed or that they found a regression. It might take a few days to get the feedback and then all weekend to come up with a new candidate. Then, you need to ask the Incubator for permission to release, which takes a minimum of 3 days (72 hours). You're now into the middle of next week. If the incubator folks find anything, it's another spin of the wheel. Craig On Mar 27, 2007, at 2:09 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote: > Patrick, > I tend to agree. Just to give us a little bit of time to wrap up a > couple > of fixes for pending Issues, how about if we set Thursday or Friday > as the > deadline for the 0.9.7 release? > > Kevin > > On 3/27/07, Patrick Linskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I don't think that any of the pending 0.9.7 issues are >> showstoppers; if >> we want to create a 0.9.7 release ASAP, I'd be content with all of >> the >> 0.9.7 issues being moved out to 0.9.8. >> >> -Patrick >> >> -- >> Patrick Linskey >> BEA Systems, Inc. >> >> _____________________________________________________________________ >> __ >> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may >> contain >> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and >> affiliated >> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted >> and/or >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the >> individual >> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended >> recipient, >> and have received this message in error, please immediately return >> this >> by email and then delete it. >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Marc Prud'hommeaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> > Behalf Of Marc Prud'hommeaux >> > Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:39 AM >> > To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: 0.9.7 release >> > >> > Matthieu- >> > >> > I don't think we have any date estimates yet. Craig was going to >> put >> > together the beginnings of a roadmap summary that should be useful >> > for this. >> > >> > Looking at the JIRA roadmap for OpenJPA (http://issues.apache.org/ >> > jira/browse/OPENJPA? >> > report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel), we >> > have a pretty ambition list of fixes for 0.9.7. If your ODE release >> > is being blocked, I wonder if it would make sense to bump >> everything >> > up a release (0.9.7 issues go to 0.9.8, and 0.9.8 goes to 0.9.9) >> and >> > cut a release sooner rather than later. >> > >> > Thoughts anyone? >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mar 26, 2007, at 11:54 AM, Matthieu Riou wrote: >> > >> > > Hi guys, >> > > >> > > We've started preparing an incubator release for ODE and we're >> now >> > > using >> > > OpenJPA (pretty happily I should say). We can't use 0.9.6 >> > as we need a >> > > couple of fixes from 0.9.7 so we've been using the snapshot >> > so far. >> > > But as >> > > you know we won't be able to release with it (and generally >> speaking >> > > depending on snapshots is not that nice). >> > > >> > > So we were just wondering if you had any time frame so far for >> > > 0.9.7 final. >> > > I've seen that you started discussing future plans so maybe 0.9.7 >> > > should >> > > happen soon enough? >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Matthieu >> > >> > >> >> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may >> contain >> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and >> affiliated >> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted >> and/or >> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the >> individual or >> entity named in this message. If you are not the intended >> recipient, and >> have received this message in error, please immediately return >> this by email >> and then delete it. >> Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
