it's entirely up to you/us. this is a top level project and can
choose it's own way :)
geir
On May 20, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
It sounds like there are a bunch of new things that we'll be doing in
this process; maybe we should do a 0.9.8 first to get the various
artifacts all sorted out, and then do a 1.0?
-Patrick
On 5/20/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that said, this is the OpenJPA project, and no matter what the state
of the infra move, anything that this group does now is independent
and disconnected from the incuabtor
On May 19, 2007, at 10:15 PM, Eddie O'Neil wrote:
> +1 -- assuming the code is ready to go, I agree that it's a good
> idea to go straight to 1.0.
>
> +1 as well to waiting until the TLP infrastructure is complete,
> which could take a week or more to unbrand from the Incubator, move
> the website content, etc.
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
> On 5/19/07, Marc Prud'hommeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I personally lean towards just bumping it up to 1.0 and cutting a
>> release as soon as possible after we complete the incubator->TLP
>> process. A release number < 1.0 suggests to so many people that a
>> product is not production-ready, and OpenJPA is so mature and
in use
>> in so many mission-critical systems that I think we should just
bump
>> all the open issues to a 1.0.1 or 1.1 release and get a 1.0
release
>> out in the public.
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 19, 2007, at 4:31 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > There's no urgency, but I think we should start discussing
what our
>> > first release should be out of incubation.
>> >
>> > Let's take a look at the issues in JIRA and decide if we
think that
>> > we're ready for a 1.0 release. If not, we can cut a 0.9.8
release
>> > and make a list of 1.0 bugs/features to follow.
>> >
>> > Craig
>> >
>> > Craig Russell
>> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/
>> products/jdo
>> > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>> >
>>
>>
--
Patrick Linskey
202 669 5907
