> What license are the tools (not the kernel modules) written with ? > > There are a number of copies of COPYING containing the LGPLv2+ (i.e. "or > any later version"), while the source code mentions LGPLv2 (i.e. "no > later version")...
Our intent was for LGPLv2 adhering bits to be "no later version". Looking at the code now, I see what you mean (I think most of the COPYING files refer to "any later version" while most of the snippets embedded in individual source files refer to "no later version"). This is something we'll need to correct; could you please file a bug so we can better track the issue? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ open-vm-tools-devel mailing list open-vm-tools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-vm-tools-devel
