2013/12/22 mutek <[email protected]> > ... > FUD: Educated economists think Bitcoin is a load of rubbish and going no > where > ... “experts” simply don’t know what will happen one way or another. > Furthermore, I would argue that it’s hard for educated economists to > predict the outcome of Bitcoin, since Bitcoin came in to being through a > totally different specialization (ie software and cryptography). >
esattamente. Vedi la storiella dell'ornitorinco http://criptovalute.blogspot.com/2013/12/bitcoin-valuta-merce-od-ornitorinco.html FUD: Bitcoin is inherently deflationary. Thus less cash for everybody to > spend. This is bad. > > Bitcoin deals with this issue by having 8 decimal places. The higher the > Bitcoin value rises, the smaller the decimal transaction size will become. > Each decimal place has a name, with the smallest unit being 1 Satoshi. If 1 > Bitcoin was worth as much as one million dollars 1 Satoshi would still only > be worth 1 USD cent. In other words, there is no need to print new > currency, we can simply use smaller units of Bitcoin. > e ai bitcoin si stanno affiancando altre criptovalute, derivate dai bitcoin. Questo non va necessariamente visto come un male per i bitcoin, ma come un sistema che una volta maturato consente delle specializzazioni ... > Conclusion > > The real point here is Bitcoin is a highly disruptive technology that has > the potential to change our lives on a fundamental level and that’s > probably the main reason it’s generating so much controversy. > ottimo post. Ognuno dei vari punti volendo meriterebbe ulteriori approfondimaneti, però è già lungo abbastanza così http://justinvincent.com/page/2172/bitcoin-fear-uncertainty-doubt _______________________________________________ Open https://lists.partito-pirata.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/open
