"Neulinger, Nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> If this were made optional (i.e. add a param to afsd), I would have
> no objection to it being added in. Personally, I'd like to see the
> cache implementation be much more modular - to allow plugging in
> different back-end storage mechanisms in different cases.

I agree with Sam. If we feel that it's good enough, it should be the
only way to create cache entries, not something you can enable if you
like it.

/Johan
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to