I would say afs_int32 should be used wherver there is an external
interface where there needs to be a known size. I think internally
there is no reason not to use 'int'.
-derek
"Neulinger, Nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is a wide mix of different usage in the code. Do we want to use
> afs_int32 everywhere, or should that be confined to cases where the size
> requires a known width, such as address storage or network routines?
>
> -- Nathan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Nathan Neulinger EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-4841
> Computing Services Fax: (573) 341-4216
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
