Bummer. I was hoping you weren't going to say that... 

Time to do some more digging... Maybe I'll build on a different box... might
be something screwy on this test one.

-- Nathan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Hartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:44 PM
> To: Neulinger, Nathan
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Anyone have i386_linux24/2.4.5-x 
> working w/
> c urrent cvs?
> 
> 
> >>>>> "Neulinger," == Neulinger, Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>     Neulinger,> Fyi - I just tried and don't have this problem on
>     Neulinger,> i386_linux22 built against current.
> 
>     Neulinger,> I'm going to try cleaning up this system and building
>     Neulinger,> again, just in case I have a kernel
>     Neulinger,> source/headers/something or other mismatch that is
>     Neulinger,> causing goofiness, but I'd still appreciate a heads up
>     Neulinger,> if anyone else is running ok with 24 and current cvs.
> 
> Not current CVS, but running fine with 2.4.0 and July 4 CVS.  I
> believe Garry Zacheiss has had some luck with currentish CVS and
> Redhat 2.4.2-2.  I do not believe he ended up using kgcc.
> 
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to