Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:22:18PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Rudolph T Maceyko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > The iget4 symbol is the same but the libafs modules themselves are NOT:
> >
> > Oooh, that does not bode well. I would be interested in knowing what
> > the differences are. This means that the SymTable is slightly broken;
> > I'll need to apply the architecture to the SymTable as well. Hmm..
> > Not too hard for the x86 processors, but might be more challenging for
> > the athlon.. Maybe...
>
> I don't think it necessarily implies that - can't a change in config
> affect the versions of some symbols and not others?
Perhaps, however _SO MUCH_ is encompassed in 'struct inode' that iget
almost always changes if any other structure changes... As I said,
it would be interesting the note what is different.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
