Nathan Neulinger wrote: > > Ken Hornstein wrote: > > > > >> Is this in the context of AFS, or just something else that's using Rx? > > >> How are you analyzing the packets? Could you run tcpdump (which should > > >> include some Rx parsing code) and see what these calls are? > > > > > >Or run Ethereal, which includes much more complete support than tcpdump, > > >as well as graphical analysis capability. > > > > Not to malign your work Nathan, or Ethereal, but I think the current > > tcpdump does more than Ethereal w.r.t. AFS (there's was a lot of > > rx stuff I added after you took it ... unless you've updated it > > more recently than I was aware of). > > Oh? Wasn't aware of that... will have to take another look at tcpdump > and see what would be good to merge into ethereal.
Maybe I'm missing something, but looks like the only place with significantly more coverage in tcpdump is in the handling of rx ack packets. Looks like in the other places, ethereal has more decoding. Are you talking about a different tcpdump than cvs on tcpdump.org? (i.e. are you still maintaining your own local patches?) -- Nathan ------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan Neulinger EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-4841 Computing Services Fax: (573) 341-4216 _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
