Seems reasonable to me... It would be nice though to get some re-indentation/re-formatting patches applies, if for no other reason than to ease maintaining of the other patches until they can be applied.
-- Nathan ------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan Neulinger EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-4841 Computing Services Fax: (573) 341-4216 > -----Original Message----- > From: Russ Allbery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Patch to add much more > diagnostics to vos movewhen run with -verbose > > > Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Russ Allbery wrote: > > >> With all due respect to the people concerned with that > sort of thing, I > >> think it's pretty unreasonable to never change the output of any > >> command to make it more user-friendly because people are > doing things > >> that they should never have had to do in the first place. > > > At minimum, though, not in a minor version update to the code. > > 1.2.3->1.2.4 should not be expected to break your scripts. > > Oh, definitely agreed. Those are the kind of patches to save > up and do > all at once during a major version change. > > -- > Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel > _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
