Does setgroups (0, x) wind up calling initgroups()?
-derek
"Neulinger, Nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not sure if this has always been this way, but it is definately an
> issue with building latest samba...
>
> Test program:
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <grp.h>
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> int x[5] = {0,0,0,0,0};
> system("id");
> setgroups(0, x);
> system("id");
> }
>
> Test output:
> uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=34479,41855,0(root),7567(dba)
> uid=0(root) gid=0(root)
>
>
> Basically, running a setgroups with an empty group list (or zero groups)
> results in the pag going away. I can't think of any time you'd _REALLY_
> want to throw away the pag.
>
> I'll work up a fix for this in the linux libafs, but would be interested
> in hearing if anyone else has a differing oppinion on how it should
> behave.
>
> -- Nathan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Nathan Neulinger EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-4841
> Computing Services Fax: (573) 341-4216
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
