On 22 Oct 2002, Derek Atkins wrote: > Oh, he merged in that crap? Damn. It's a read-only, > no-authentication, no-vlserver-lookup AFS client. What's > the point?
I would assume it's progressed since then. Wasn't there read-only UFS before rw existed, and so on? I suppose no precedent when other options existed, but there's precedent for that sort of thing. There are circumstances under which the linux kernel AFS client could be very interesting, but thus far nothing points at it. Drop me a private email if you care, there's no point in beating this into the ground. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
