On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, [iso-8859-2] Martin MOKREJŠ wrote: > Hi, > so I've upgraded from IBM AFS 2.32 to openafs-1.2.7 official binaries > and have couple of problems: > > 1. bosserver and others services don't start as kernel report > > Dec 10 17:11:41 1A:xx unix: |$(0x6da)ALERT: Process [vlserver] pid 1170 killed: >process or stack limit exceeded > Dec 10 17:11:47 1A:xx unix: |$(0x6da)ALERT: Process [ptserver] pid 1173 killed: >process or stack limit exceeded > > What makes them so memory hungry? I did not change kernel settings at all? > Would someone have a look into the changes between these version for what > might be the of this?
The default "limit"s are probably too small. Did you run it from a shell or from an rc script? The latter probably is unlimited while the former is probably limited. What does running: limit offer? > Tue Dec 10 17:09:55 2002 XFS/EFS File server starting > Tue Dec 10 17:11:06 2002 VL_RegisterAddrs rpc failed; will retry periodically >(code=5376, err=2) > Tue Dec 10 17:11:07 2002 Partition /vicepa: XFS inodes too small, exiting. > Tue Dec 10 17:11:07 2002 Run xfs_size_check utility and remake partitions. That's a new one on me. I don't know enough about XFS offhand to comment. > PtLog > Tue Dec 10 17:11:41 2002 Using 195.113.59.111 as my primary address That's good. > Why does /salvager care about /vicepa, when I asked it to look only > at /vicepb? When fileserver died, it tried to salvage. unmount /vicepa if you don't want it considered. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
