I meant ALL of it... Data types, macros, functions, etc. To eliminate all of the conflicts. i.e. AFSXDRS instead of XDRS.
-- Nathan On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 14:53, Derrick J Brashear wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Nathan Neulinger wrote: > > > What do y'all think of coming up with a unique prefix/naming/etc. for > > all of the rx XDR stuff in openafs to eliminate ALL of the conflicts > > that can occur? > > afs_ > > look how the kernel works. but it's not technically a bug. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan Neulinger EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-4841 Computing Services Fax: (573) 341-4216 _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
