On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Nathan Neulinger wrote: > I just hate to dramatically change the semantics of mounts like you > describe by default since it makes it impossible to use a backup volume > in a way that it had previously been used. The idea does seem very > useful though.
I'm curious, what are you doing? I never traverse mountpoints below going into a .backup intentionally, sometimes accidentally, and in those cases, I'd rather have that backup volume, also, if only because in all the cases I care about the whole tree is backed up at the same time. What are you doing that I'm not? _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
