On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Derek Atkins wrote:

> I'm not convinced it's the building against multiple kernels that's
> the issue, but rather it's the inclusion of modules for multiple
> kernels in a single RPM without a specific Requires directive.
>
> I agree that having per-kernel module packages is the "right thing".

Is there some middle ground here that can make everyone except the grumpy
person I theorized happy?

_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to