Anatoly Oreshkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> afs_syscall(0x1c, 0xa, 0x5029a, 0, 0xbfffc430) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not 
> implemented)
> ...
>
> It looks like that afsd forks necessary demons rx listener,
> rx callback listener, rxevent daemon. But these demons exit abnormaly.
>
> What may be the reason ?  Any hints ?

That's your hint...  The afsd process can't call afs_syscall because
it's returning ENOSYS.  This implies the afs_syscall did not get
properly installed into the kernel.

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                        PGP key available
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to