On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Ken Hornstein wrote: > >> Remind me again how many damn #ifdefs are in process.s? :-) > > > >Maintaining something which is already split implementations per platform > >is different than willingly adding more of the same. > > I guess my point that given the architecture dependencies already in AFS, > we could argue whether or not a "generic" fileserver exists today. I
pthreads: not ours rx userlevel: not overly system-specific namei: generic pretty bland stuff > don't see a huge problem with changing the way we do FD management > to a more efficient per-platform system. And if it's all hidden inside > LWP (since that's what seems to handle FDs today; I don't see any calls to > select() or poll() in the fileserver), does it really matter? it's udp. there's a socket. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
