On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 21:34:29 -0500 Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

There is no absolute requirement, but convention is to use a
fqdn.  If you ever intend to allow anyone else to access
your data, you should definitely use the fqdn.

Should cells be named "redcell" or "redcell.ted-doris.fam"

In most cases, AFS cells are also Kerberos realms.


In these cases, the AFS cell name should be the all-lowercase version of the name of the corresponding Kerberos realm. For realms you plan to use with AFS, the realm name should be a valid domain-style realm name (as described in section 7.1 of RFC1510, or section 6.1 of draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-04.txt), corresponding to a domain which you control.

In a few cases, there are reasons to name a cell something different (most commonly, because there are multiple cells in the same realm). Even when this is the case, cell names should still correspond to the fully-qualified name of a domain you control.


Now, a break for some administrivia:
Ted also sent a followup question to openafs-devel-admin, instead of to this list. Please, folks, don't do that. Those of you using Outlook need to specifically check on EVERY REPLY that it's not inappropriately replying to the address in the "Sender" header or in the SMTP envelope (which is the list administrator address), instead of to the address in the From or Reply-To headers.


In any event, hitting "reply" to a message you see on this list will not send your reply to the list -- it will either send it to the author of your message or, if your mailer is broken, to the list administrator. If you want your reply to go to the list, make sure you are sending it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and not to some other address.



Ted's followup question was this:

My internal domain is family.fam but I would get in from the outside using
dhs_name.dhs.org - which I have to use because Comcast rolls my IP address
occasionally - kind of "semi-dynamic, every few months or so"..

Since CellServDB needs fixed IP addresses (really fixed) what's the best
way to update?

The current users harken from the time when dynamic IP addresses weren't
an issue.

You should give your cell the name of a real domain you control in the public DNS. Don't use a name like family.fam, because "fam" is not currently a valid TLD, but might be sometime in the future, and then your cell name might conflict with someone else's.


However, there's an even better reason to use a real domain name. If you do, you can publish AFSDB records for your cell, and do away with the CellServDB entirely. The right hand side of an AFSDB record contains a domain name, not an IP address, so once the records exist you don't need to update them every time your address changes -- just update the DNS record naming your dbserver, as you do now.

-- Jeffrey T. Hutzelman (N3NHS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Sr. Research Systems Programmer
  School of Computer Science - Research Computing Facility
  Carnegie Mellon University - Pittsburgh, PA

_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to