I will have to take a look next week, but if this patch behaves as described, my objection is lifted.
This may be a good starting point for doing our own internal implementation that does cross-platform support since it gives us an easy starting path - reimplement the posix_ routines ourselves, but let's at least get this one in. However, if we are nearing a 1.4 release, I would say this is probably 1.4.>1 material as opposed to 1.4.0. -- Nathan On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 20:32 -0400, Matt Benjamin wrote: > Nathan, > > I looked at concurrency, I don't observe that a F_SETLKW client blocks a > client requesting a non-overlapping range (ie, at AFS_GLOCK()). Doesn't > appear to be the case, from what I observe. After your comment, I > wondered why not. > > Matt > > Matt Benjamin wrote: > > > I think this corrects the oversight--thanks for the help, Nathan. > > > > I take the point about handling other platforms, and would like to > > look at the options, but I couldn't look closely for a while. (Also, > > note that this is a rather concise fix.) > > > > Matt > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan Neulinger EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-6679 UMR Information Technology Fax: (573) 341-4216 _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
