Hi Jeff!
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
On Sunday, August 28, 2005 16:30:41 -0400 Derrick J Brashear
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From jhutz, try this:
--- rx.c 30 May 2005 04:55:26 -0000 1.82
+++ rx.c 28 Aug 2005 20:30:00 -0000
@@ -1146,7 +1146,11 @@
/* Client is initially in send mode */
call->state = RX_STATE_ACTIVE;
- call->mode = RX_MODE_SENDING;
+ call->error = conn->error;
+ if (call->error)
+ call->mode = RX_MODE_ERROR;
+ else
+ call->mode = RX_MODE_SENDING;
/* remember start time for call in case we have hard dead time
limit */
call->queueTime = queueTime;
Yeah; that's functionally equivalent to the patch I sent -- Derrick and I
reconstructed this over the phone when it became apparent my message was
stuck in a mail queue somewhere.
Note that while I think this may fix the problem, I don't have an easy way to
reproduce the problem and test the fix. We'll also need a certain amount of
testing to be convinced this doesn't have any unintended side-effects.
Thanks! Now I can try something ;-) I'll give it a run at my cluster, so
we should know in a few days if it's fixed. Does this patch modify the
kernel module, the afsd or both?
Ciao,
Roland
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
