Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting Jim Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > My personal feeling is that I'd prefer to get callbacks, rather than > have to wait 10 minutes to find out that files I'm using have changed. > Also, the fact that it requires a 1.4.1 server means that most of the > servers I contact (which I do not control) are not going to have this patch > for a while.. So, I'd like to see a client-side "throw extra network > usage at the problem" patch in place. > > -derek
The older servers that do not track clients by address and port but only by address are going to have many other problems when dealing with NAT'd clients. Bombarding the servers with probes from multiple clients behind a NAT may result in adverse consequences on the server that you and the administrator are not prepared to deal with. Jeffrey Altman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
