On Monday, August 06, 2007 02:12:20 PM -0500 "Douglas E. Engert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What plan? Is there a plan? All I have seen is this thread on what to do about K5 principal names with periods, and how this conflicts what the pts does with multiple part principals and how it uses a K4 style "." as a separator.
There is a plan for adding full native support for krb5 principal names and other mechanism-independent names. This has been discussed at multiple hackathons, the proceedings of which are available online. Some implementation work has been done, but mostly in the vein of adding the needed extensibility to the PRDB.
The question which started this thread is relevant to OpenAFS today. The answer will probably have some effect on the default rules under the new system, but it's far too soon to tell what that will be.
-- Jeff _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
