Felix Frank wrote: > There were no further objections, so that's what it now does.
Not receiving any further comments is not the same as not receiving objections. Your patch should not include the xdr_free() changes. We already have a DELTA for those changes. It is appropriate to state that your patch is dependent upon DELTA xdr-free-20090401 being pulled to the 1.4 branch. However, please note that new code such as this is not going to go on the 1.4 branch. It is going to go onto the CVS head and incorporated into 1.5 releases. As such, patches should be provided against the CVS head. The 1.4 release series is "stable". What that means to most is that the only code changes that get applied to it from release to release are: * something necessary to fix a bug * something necessary to make the code build on a new OS revision * something that addresses an operational issue that affects a large portion of the user base RxOSD does not meet any of these criteria. It would be nice if we would have the 1.5 series promoted to 1.6 (aka the next "stable") by the end of the year. Jeffrey Altman _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
