On 28 Sep 2010, at 22:42, Andrew Deason wrote:

> I'm possibly bikeshedding, but... we don't want to just let the caller
> worry about allocation?
[...]
> Or are we trying to allow extending the structure or something?

My general preference is for interfaces in which the library performs both the 
allocation and the deallocation. In this case, it would allow us to 
transparently extend the statistics structure, as long as we always added new 
entries at the end, and never reused existing fields.

S.

_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to