On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:13:46 -0400 Derrick Brashear <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 12:11:31 +0100 > > Simon Wilkinson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> AIX is the only platform on which we use a different C compiler > >> binary to build against pthreads - xlc_r, rather than cc. > >> > >> Is there any reason that we couldn't just use xlc_r to build both > >> LWP and pthread targets? > > > > I wouldn't be the one to know about this, but... I thought the only > > difference between xlc_r and xlc > > sure, but this is xlc versus vc (VAC cc) Er, yeah. Somehow I read xlc, not cc. Isn't that still the case there, though? On the AIX box I tried, the cc in my path is still a hard link to xlc_r (and xlc, etc etc) with just different settings in /etc/vac.cfg.* . My point is, I thought these were just convenient different invocations, or a way to make the different invocations configurable. They're all the same compiler; invoking the same name may just mean we need to twiddle the flags. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
