On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Phillip Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, if this simple patch to the current pioctl can be made without all > that overhead, then someone else can fix this, unfortunately. I thought > this would be relatively simple, and it's a fix I don't really need > personally. Sorry to be selfish... > The real question is: do I need a new pioctl for this? I'm just modifying > the existing code and changing it's behavior.
which is precisely why you need a new pioctl. which isn't that hard. just mail the registrar and ask for the next one. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
