Russ Allbery <[email protected]> writes: > Thanks for the report! We should use the same technique that was used > to solve the same problem in the krb5 library check for consistency, I > think. There, I probed for roken first, similar to your option 1, since > that fits the model used for all other optional dependency libraries. I > can see the appeal in option two, but it requires fiddling with internal > Autoconf cache variables, and I don't trust that to continue working in > later versions since it's not part of the documented Autoconf interface.
> I'm on vacation at the moment so can't easily work on this, but I'll add > a fix to rra-c-util (which is upstream for this file) as soon as I get > back. Now submitted as http://gerrit.openafs.org/#change,4587 -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
