On 5/18/2011 4:34 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 13:24:19 -0700
Russ Allbery<[email protected]> wrote:
doc/man-pages/README says:
* Document vos delentry -noexecute. Should this option
also be renamed to -dryrun like others?
Can I do those 2 things as a first effort to get
myself up and familiar with OpenAFS development,
git, gerrit, etc ?
Sure, absolutely. Note that the second one is a proposed change to
the vos command itself, rather than the documentation; I don't know if
you meant tackling that in addition.
Yes, I intended both.
And such a change should keep delentry -noexecute around for
compatibility.
How about allowing both as you suggest, but also
marking the 'vos delentry' help as:
-noexecute (deprecated, same as -dryrun)
-dryrun show what would be done, but don't do it
And an opened ticket with milestone 1.7 to get rid
of -noexecute ?
This raises another issue. Across the commands allowing
-dryrun, here are the explanations:
-dryrun report without updating
-dryrun no action
-dryrun only list what would be done, don't do it
I'd like to settle on:
list what would be done, don't do it
May I make that change as well across the commands
where -dryrun is allowed?
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
