Yes, the afsio in the codecase does not use the client cache. Jason Edgecombe <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 08/22/2011 10:22 AM, Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) wrote: >> In message<[email protected]>,Jason Edgecombe writes: >>> I was wondering. What data from production environments would be helpful >>> for the OpenAFS developers? Would it help us to set priorities? Would it >>> help us pinpoint performance bottlenecks? Could the data be gathered >>> without a significant performance penalty? >> i think the primary problem here might be that there isnt an 'afs server' >> benchmark that you can run. you can bench the drives, network or the >> cpu individually but there isnt anything (that i know of) to quantify an >> entire configuration. collecting sar is nice, but some systems dont have >> the same capabilities so you might want something that is cross platform >> (just like afs). >> >> talking to the fileservers though would be the best choice. i gave >> using afsio some thought but i havent looked into it closely enough to >> see how much of the client cache is in use (which you would want to test >> seperately i imagine). >> >I thought afsio avoided the client cache. Is there another option to use? > >I vaguely recall some idea of recoding client/fileserver operations ans >replaying them to the fileserver. Did anything come of that? > >Jason >_______________________________________________ >OpenAFS-devel mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel > ____________________________________________________________ TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if5 Capture screenshots, upload images, edit and send them to your friends through IMs, post on Twitter®, Facebook®, MySpace™, LinkedIn® – FAST! _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
