On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Derrick Brashear <[email protected]> wrote: > Moved to openafs-devel > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Hartmut Reuter <[email protected]> wrote: >> Derrick Brashear wrote: >>> >>> well, i can tell you the first problem: it reuses RPCs but changes >>> their signatures. >> >> >> This is exactly what it should do in order to make sure that any mixed >> configuration doesn't work. They will get back RXGEN_SS_UNMARSHAL errors >> and give up. > > Disagree. If you want to cause them to get an error, don't implement > the (different numbered) RPCs, and then RXGEN_OPCODE saves you.
(e.g. leave them out of the .xg... or, optionally leave them in and have dummy stubs which return RXGEN_OPCODE) -- Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
