Andrew Deason <adea...@sinenomine.net> writes: > If the only reason for keeping this around is to keep the 'sometimes > works' behavior working sometimes, should I take it that making this > behavior runtime configurable is not out of the question?
Runtime configuration is usually the worst of all available options. > Or are you/others of the opinion that this should be considered part of > the protocol semantics that should not be changed? i.e., if the AFS > protocol were documented, what would be said wrt this? I would default to documenting the semantics, given that they've existed for years. Is there a specific problem that you're trying to fix, or was this just something you'd stumbled across? -- Russ Allbery (r...@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
