On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:33:38 -0800 Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Or are you/others of the opinion that this should be considered part > > of the protocol semantics that should not be changed? i.e., if the > > AFS protocol were documented, what would be said wrt this? > > I would default to documenting the semantics, given that they've > existed for years. er, I don't know if this matters at all, but I'm not sure if I was clear here. I meant this more like, "the fileserver MUST NOT break callbacks when nlink reaches 0" or MAY NOT, SHOULD NOT, etc... ? -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
