> There is a broader problem as well which is that there is a significant
> concentration of development resources in a very small number of
> organizations.  Your File System Inc. is responsible for funding or
> implementing over 60% of the code contributions to OpenAFS.  Sine Nomine is
> responsible for about 20% and the remaining 15% or so come from
> approximately 30 to 35 other developers or documentation writers over the
> course of a year.

Well, based on presumably commits for the last 2 years. Before that,
the numbers would
have been different (and I haven't calculated them, nor this)

> It is my opinion as a gatekeeper that there can be no long term improvement
> in the OpenAFS release scheduling until such time as the underlying
> financing problems are addressed.  Until OpenAFS has some resources to
> manage, the gatekeepers will continue to do the best we can with the time
> that is available to us.

And for what it's worth, that's basically the same as it's been since day 1.
I always considered myself a bugfixer of last resort, and that's still
how it is.

-- 
Derrick
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to