On 9 Apr 2012, at 15:03, Jason Edgecombe wrote: > hi everyone, > > I'm thinking of adding a "make check" step to the non-windows build slaves. > > Is this a good idea? Bad idea? Comments?
Theoretically, it is a great idea. There are a couple of potential problems, though. *) Ideally, make check would do a complete test of all of the functionality in OpenAFS. Obviously we are a very long way away from that, but each test that we add will slow down the "make check" process. I have worked on large projects where the test suite takes much, much longer to execute than the build process, so this is a consideration for our slower builders. *) I'm not sure that all of our tests fail cleanly. There may be some tests that fail by hanging, or some failure modes that leave daemons running. Dealing with these will add to the administration overhead of the build farm. I think I'd prefer, at the moment, that we had a single builder doing a make check, rather than having every builder execute them. Cheers, Simon. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
