On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 20:09, Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> wrote: .....
This: > The rule for patchset submission is that its size should be small enough > that a skilled reviewer with strong familiarity of the code should be > able to perform a thorough review in under an hour. and this: > Those two entities are responsible for over 85% of the contributions in > the last 12 months. This is of course the crux of the problem with > OpenAFS. There simply isn't a pool of independent developers to pull from. Is really the conflict. There are (by your references) around a dozen people who actively contribute, and are therefore most likely to be capable of being a skilled reviewer of the code base. Code base memory atrophies. Use it, or lose it. >From my POV, I accept that reviews are going to take time (along with the fact that most of the future work is hard/big), and live with the implications of that reality. I appreciate all the work that does make it through the process. If I were to ask for more, I also would expect to be asked to send resources for that. Gary _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
