On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Simon Wilkinson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 16 Sep 2012, at 21:03, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> Jason Edgecombe <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> * the openafs-git debian packaging files need to be synced with the more >>> recent Debian project's packaging repo. >> >> If you want builds on master, you need a lot more than that; what's >> currently in the tree won't work for master because of the significant >> changes to the library layout. That's what I was alluding to in the >> previous message. > > The dust hasn't entirely settled here yet, either. At the moment, our > _public_ masters on library are approximately what they are on 1.6. The > oafs_* libtool libraries are not installed, and where they are used by > binaries, they are used statically. > > At some point, I do plan on installing the libtool libraries, and on > converting from static to dynamic builds by default (those who like to use up > their disk space and memory with static binaries will still be able to do so > with --disable-shared). However, before this happens, we need to resolve the > whole question of the 'make dest' style of relocatable package, which just > won't work with a shared library based system.
A trivial "install script" which fixes them with chrpath e.g. http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/notes/rpath.html would work but is not really on top of my list of ways I'd like to deal. Still, better than the good old fun with dump and undump to build emacs binaries! -- Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
