> While I appreciate that your intentions are well meaning, central.org is > a trusted provider of services to openafs.org. While OpenAFS may make > requests of the central.org administrators, their time is hard to come > by and the Gatekeepers would rather they spend their efforts on > developing the processes necessary to permit broader access to members > of the community. Customizing RT to permit SPNEGO authentication is far > down on the list.
Is OpenID for RT on that list? > My final comment is that OpenAFS uses central.org because the > individuals that run it are trusted to protect the privacy of the data > stored within RT. In particular, the contents of non-public queues. > > Jeffrey Altman That sounds like the compelling reason to use RT I was asking about earlier. Which brings up another point... is OpenID (and various common openid providers) sufficiently trusted to allow easy authenticated community access to RT? A policy of no OpenID logins for non-public queues might be reasonable. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
