On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:40:26 +0100 Simon Wilkinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Then, there is an additional question - is the hit you take from cache > invalidation worth terminating a call for? That's going to be a trade > off, but I suspect that the current behaviour just doesn't allow a > server enough time to tidy up. Can you explain what you mean here? Which call? The call that failed that caused us to invalidate cache has already terminated. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
