On Wed, 22 May 2013 23:20:31 +0300 Markus Suvanto <[email protected]> wrote:
> config.log is in attachment. On more thing, I only recompile kernel > module and everything else including /usr/sbin/afsd comes from gentoo > portage and currently it is net-fs/openafs 1.6.2 I assume this hasn't shown up on the actual -devel list because of that attachment. In the future, you may want to just link to it elsewhere, or at least compress it before sending. But yeah, the config.log for the kernel module is all I was looking for. Anyway, it seems like quite a few configure tests succeed which should fail, but I can't find any yet that should matter. For example, both DOP_REVALIDATE_TAKES_UNSIGNED and DOP_REVALIDATE_TAKES_NAMEIDATA are defined. It looks like these require -Werror to actually fail for an incorect type for that last argument; Marc, is there a reason that's not specified now? That shouldn't matter, since the UNSIGNED one takes precedence over the NAMEIDATA check. And looking at the preprocessed output and the actual compiled module for me, it really looks like we are indeed checking the correct flags for RCU (in both 'd_revalidate' and 'permission'). -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
